An emoticon-embellished joke that I made to Claude Code led me down a deep rabbit hole. This joke, seven words long, was not a request for the coding agent to perform work. But by the end of the day, the joke had resulted in a new tool in my repository, fixes for nine documentation defects, the discovery that one of my app’s features was 72 percent unimplemented, and a conversation about the murder of Thomas Becket that taught me something about Germanic bear taboos.

Continue reading →

A fable is a story that speaks: Latin fabula, from fari, “to speak”, and in the genre as Aesop and La Fontaine practiced it, the speaking is done by animals. An opus is a work: the crafted thing itself, named for its workmanship. Today, June 9, 2026, Anthropic released Fable 5, a new model positioned above Opus 4.8 and priced at twice Opus’s rate per token. I wanted to know, before release day ended, what that premium buys a working iOS developer. So I staged a contest of genres: four Claude Code sessions, two models at two effort levels apiece, each session given an identical request to review the codebase of Conjuguer, my French-conjugation app, and to rank what it found by impact. This post is the comparison, with tables. Being about a fable, it ends with a moral.

Continue reading →

Every prompt I send to Claude Code carries a hidden dial. Turn it one way and I wait twice as long, and pay nearly twice the tokens, for an answer I could have had sooner. Turn it the other way and I get a competent, forgettable response to a question that deserved judgment. The dial is called effort, and for the seven months I have used Claude Code I have never been sure where to leave it.

Continue reading →